GARTHIsTheLaw
League Member
Evolution Schmevolution
[updated:LAST EDITED ON Jul-23-03 AT 05:18 PM (EST)]Saying that Triple-H's lame-ass character will eventually change is not a good justification for its present stupidity. Essentially nothing has changed about his gimmick for years, except that he was briefly a face. You mention that The Undertaker has made a lot of changes too, but he's been around for almost twice as long as Triple-H and usually remains fairly interesting when he's a main-eventer (except for his brief run as champion when he was with the Corporate Ministry, which wasn't so great). Besides that, he's never made it his personal quest to bury all talented competition...the competition he's buried in his career has traditionally been the extraordinarily talentless kind (your Kamalas, your Giant Gonzalezes, your King Kong Bundies, your Underfakers).
Did you see how Triple-H and Randy Orton got almost no crowd reaction on Raw? Randy Orton's mic skills are hideous, and everyone is tired of Triple-H's "unbeatable world champion" persona by now. When Goldberg came out and confronted Evolution, it looked identical to the confrontation between Triple-H and Scott Steiner back in December, and the confrontation between Triple-H and Kevin Nash back in April. He just keeps going through the same routine...we can only hope that Goldberg's ego is big enough to counteract Triple-H's, though that means if Goldberg wins the title we'll have the exact same problem. The only good thing about Triple-H's title run is that he gave Nash a little bit of his own "book-myself-to-the-top" medicine, but that's it.
Kane, on the other hand, I like. I thought unmasking him would be an amazingly bad idea, especially when I saw his makeup after the mask first came off. But it gets better every week. They did a good job of making him look more like a monster than like Isaac Yankem DDS, so I give props for that. And the fact that he only THINKS he's scarred makes sense too...he comes off as pretty unbalanced, which gives MORE justification to his newfound brutality than would just being ugly. True, there's a continuity problem or two...he's lost his mask to the Stooges, X-Pac, Randy Orton, and some others that I've forgotten...but other than that I think it's going pretty well. Having him just remove the mask once and then put it back on would be retarded - it would result in absolutely zero change to his character and he'd just go back to being an upper-level midcarder, accomplishing nothing. The best part is, Triple-H just HAD to be the guy to beat him and make him lose the mask, he needs an ego boost now that Stephanie is slowly transforming into Chyna...and, judging by crowd reactions, Kane is now Raw's top heel, beating out Triple-H for the spot. Oh how sweet it is. Kane was great when he was an unstoppable monster, and I think unmasking him is really the only way they could have provided a credible reason for his turning back into one.
The idea of having Goldberg spear Randy Orton when he goes to get his shirt is...um...special...but I agree that the segment on Raw was pretty lame (interesting note: during the ensuing commercial break, Goldberg went to jump up on the turnbuckle and play to the crowd, then tripped and fell down. The entire crowd started laughing and he flipped a few of them off before realizing he's a face and he can't do that). Here's the problem: In order for an opponent to be a credible challenger to The Immortal Triple-H, there apparently has to be an ENORMOUS amount of buildup for this opponent. As I said, we saw it with Scott Steiner and we saw it with Kevin Nash. Triple-H's immortality is threatened if he loses to someone too easily, so that means the match must have a ridiculous amount of buildup. Result? The angle becomes very very dull. Triple-H vs. Goldberg at SummerSlam will probably be just as disappointing as his matches with Steiner and Nash, with the only perk being that this time he might actually lose. And isn't Evolution already hanging around girls? Isn't that part of their gimmick? I could've sworn.
I have no problem with Gail Kim. Okay, she isn't really very interesting, and the spot she #####ed up on Raw was jaw-dropping, but aside from that she can work a decent match, and - let's face it - the women's division in the WWE is some boring-ass ##### these days. Plus it's been awhile since the WWE had a female face who can work a decent match...all the good ones are heels (Victoria, Jazz, Molly Holly) while the face side is mostly just eye candy with more silicone than talent (Trish, Ivory, Jacqueline).
To conclude, I still find SmackDown the more interesting show, but the more airtime they give to the Vince/Steph/Sable/Zach Gowen angle, the less I like it (not that I mind Zach, I'd just like him more if they'd let him wrestle a little more often), and the more of this Kane angle I see the more interesting I find Raw. If Goldberg beats Triple-H at SummerSlam and then Kane beats Goldberg for the title, that would rock so much...but it's probably just a pipe dream.
[updated:LAST EDITED ON Jul-23-03 AT 05:18 PM (EST)]Saying that Triple-H's lame-ass character will eventually change is not a good justification for its present stupidity. Essentially nothing has changed about his gimmick for years, except that he was briefly a face. You mention that The Undertaker has made a lot of changes too, but he's been around for almost twice as long as Triple-H and usually remains fairly interesting when he's a main-eventer (except for his brief run as champion when he was with the Corporate Ministry, which wasn't so great). Besides that, he's never made it his personal quest to bury all talented competition...the competition he's buried in his career has traditionally been the extraordinarily talentless kind (your Kamalas, your Giant Gonzalezes, your King Kong Bundies, your Underfakers).
Did you see how Triple-H and Randy Orton got almost no crowd reaction on Raw? Randy Orton's mic skills are hideous, and everyone is tired of Triple-H's "unbeatable world champion" persona by now. When Goldberg came out and confronted Evolution, it looked identical to the confrontation between Triple-H and Scott Steiner back in December, and the confrontation between Triple-H and Kevin Nash back in April. He just keeps going through the same routine...we can only hope that Goldberg's ego is big enough to counteract Triple-H's, though that means if Goldberg wins the title we'll have the exact same problem. The only good thing about Triple-H's title run is that he gave Nash a little bit of his own "book-myself-to-the-top" medicine, but that's it.
Kane, on the other hand, I like. I thought unmasking him would be an amazingly bad idea, especially when I saw his makeup after the mask first came off. But it gets better every week. They did a good job of making him look more like a monster than like Isaac Yankem DDS, so I give props for that. And the fact that he only THINKS he's scarred makes sense too...he comes off as pretty unbalanced, which gives MORE justification to his newfound brutality than would just being ugly. True, there's a continuity problem or two...he's lost his mask to the Stooges, X-Pac, Randy Orton, and some others that I've forgotten...but other than that I think it's going pretty well. Having him just remove the mask once and then put it back on would be retarded - it would result in absolutely zero change to his character and he'd just go back to being an upper-level midcarder, accomplishing nothing. The best part is, Triple-H just HAD to be the guy to beat him and make him lose the mask, he needs an ego boost now that Stephanie is slowly transforming into Chyna...and, judging by crowd reactions, Kane is now Raw's top heel, beating out Triple-H for the spot. Oh how sweet it is. Kane was great when he was an unstoppable monster, and I think unmasking him is really the only way they could have provided a credible reason for his turning back into one.
The idea of having Goldberg spear Randy Orton when he goes to get his shirt is...um...special...but I agree that the segment on Raw was pretty lame (interesting note: during the ensuing commercial break, Goldberg went to jump up on the turnbuckle and play to the crowd, then tripped and fell down. The entire crowd started laughing and he flipped a few of them off before realizing he's a face and he can't do that). Here's the problem: In order for an opponent to be a credible challenger to The Immortal Triple-H, there apparently has to be an ENORMOUS amount of buildup for this opponent. As I said, we saw it with Scott Steiner and we saw it with Kevin Nash. Triple-H's immortality is threatened if he loses to someone too easily, so that means the match must have a ridiculous amount of buildup. Result? The angle becomes very very dull. Triple-H vs. Goldberg at SummerSlam will probably be just as disappointing as his matches with Steiner and Nash, with the only perk being that this time he might actually lose. And isn't Evolution already hanging around girls? Isn't that part of their gimmick? I could've sworn.
I have no problem with Gail Kim. Okay, she isn't really very interesting, and the spot she #####ed up on Raw was jaw-dropping, but aside from that she can work a decent match, and - let's face it - the women's division in the WWE is some boring-ass ##### these days. Plus it's been awhile since the WWE had a female face who can work a decent match...all the good ones are heels (Victoria, Jazz, Molly Holly) while the face side is mostly just eye candy with more silicone than talent (Trish, Ivory, Jacqueline).
To conclude, I still find SmackDown the more interesting show, but the more airtime they give to the Vince/Steph/Sable/Zach Gowen angle, the less I like it (not that I mind Zach, I'd just like him more if they'd let him wrestle a little more often), and the more of this Kane angle I see the more interesting I find Raw. If Goldberg beats Triple-H at SummerSlam and then Kane beats Goldberg for the title, that would rock so much...but it's probably just a pipe dream.